Spell v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Spell v. State

179 S.E. 583, 51 Ga. App. 96, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 573

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 8, 1935

Docket24612

StatusPublished

This text of 179 S.E. 583 (Spell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Spell v. State, 179 S.E. 583, 51 Ga. App. 96, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 573 (Ga. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Gueery, J.

The defendant was convicted upon an accusation charging him

with the offense of possessing intoxicating liquors. The evidence amply supports the verdict. The amended grounds of the motion for new trial are without merit. The trial judge having approved the finding of the jury by overruling the motion for a new trial, this court can not interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gueery, J.

The defendant was convicted upon an accusation charging him

with the offense of possessing intoxicating liquors. The evidence amply supports the verdict. The amended grounds of the motion for new trial are without merit. The trial judge having approved the finding of the jury by overruling the motion for a new trial, this court can not interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

179 S.E. 583, 51 Ga. App. 96, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spell-v-state-gactapp-1935.