Speiser v. Randall

355 U.S. 880, 78 S. Ct. 148
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 25, 1957
DocketNo. 483; No. 484
StatusPublished

This text of 355 U.S. 880 (Speiser v. Randall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Speiser v. Randall, 355 U.S. 880, 78 S. Ct. 148 (1957).

Opinion

Appeals from the Supreme Court of California. [881]*881Probable jurisdiction noted.

Franklin H. Williams for appellants. Dion B. Holm for appellees.

Reported below: No. 483, 48 Cal. 2d 903, 311 P. 2d 546; No. 484, 48 Cal. 2d 472, 311 P. 2d 544.

The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Prince v. City & County of San Francisco
311 P.2d 544 (California Supreme Court, 1957)
Speiser v. Randall
311 P.2d 546 (California Supreme Court, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
355 U.S. 880, 78 S. Ct. 148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/speiser-v-randall-scotus-1957.