Speiser v. Greitzer

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Speiser v. Greitzer

113 N.Y.S. 815

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedDecember 16, 1908

StatusPublished

This text of 113 N.Y.S. 815 (Speiser v. Greitzer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Speiser v. Greitzer, 113 N.Y.S. 815 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff appeals from an ex parte order, which vacated an order obtained ex parte, which last order denied a motion to open defendant’s default, upon the ground that the defendant had failed to comply with a previous order which opened such default. It is unnecessary to enter into a discussion as to the validity of the several orders herein. It is sufficient to say that the order appealed from is not one of the orders from which an appeal can be taken, and the appeal must therefore be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed, with $10 costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff appeals from an ex parte order, which vacated an order obtained ex parte, which last order denied a motion to open defendant’s default, upon the ground that the defendant had failed to comply with a previous order which opened such default. It is unnecessary to enter into a discussion as to the validity of the several orders herein. It is sufficient to say that the order appealed from is not one of the orders from which an appeal can be taken, and the appeal must therefore be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed, with $10 costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

113 N.Y.S. 815, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/speiser-v-greitzer-nyappterm-1908.