Speirs v. Dick's Clothing & Sporting Goods, Inc.

268 A.D.2d 581, 702 N.Y.S.2d 842, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 917
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 31, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 268 A.D.2d 581 (Speirs v. Dick's Clothing & Sporting Goods, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Speirs v. Dick's Clothing & Sporting Goods, Inc., 268 A.D.2d 581, 702 N.Y.S.2d 842, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 917 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Beisner, J.), dated September 19, 1998, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The affidavit of the plaintiffs’ expert, submitted in opposition to the defendant’s motion, was conclusory, not based on the expert’s personal knowledge, and did not set forth any specific safety guidelines allegedly violated by the merchandise display base over which the injured plaintiff fell. Therefore, that affi[582]*582davit was insufficient to defeat the defendant’s motion for summary judgment (see, Levitt v County of Suffolk, 145 AD2d 414, 415; Estate of Burke v Repetti & Co., 255 AD2d 483; see also, McCrorey v City of Buffalo, 210 AD2d 908).

The merchandise display base was an open and obvious condition readily observable through the reasonable use of one’s senses (Binensztok v Marshall Stores, 228 AD2d 534; see also, Russell v Archer Bldg. Ctrs., 219 AD2d 772, 773). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion. Mangano, P. J., Altman, Schmidt and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Beadell v. Eros Mgt. Reality, LLC
2024 NY Slip Op 02496 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
Smith v. Target Corporation
N.D. New York, 2023
Schwartz v. Kings Third Avenue Pharmacy, Inc.
116 A.D.3d 474 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Shatzkin v. Village of Croton-on-Hudson
51 A.D.3d 903 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Arbusto v. Amerada Hess Corp.
16 A.D.3d 527 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Cranston v. Nyack Public Schools
303 A.D.2d 441 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Veccia v. Clearmeadow Pistol Club, Ltd.
300 A.D.2d 472 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Oberstein v. Mayfair Super Markets, Inc.
298 A.D.2d 446 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Cicero v. Selden Associates
295 A.D.2d 391 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Pedersen v. Kar, Ltd.
283 A.D.2d 625 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
D'Angelo v. DeLucia
283 A.D.2d 385 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Connor v. Taylor Rental Center, Inc.
278 A.D.2d 270 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
268 A.D.2d 581, 702 N.Y.S.2d 842, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 917, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/speirs-v-dicks-clothing-sporting-goods-inc-nyappdiv-2000.