Speik v. Sutphin

99 P.2d 656, 15 Cal. 2d 764, 1940 Cal. LEXIS 270
California Supreme Court·Decided February 29, 1940·No. L. A. No. 16530·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

GIBSON, J.

This is an action to quiet title and to obtain declaratory relief in respect to rights arising under an [765]*765oil lease. The action raises the same issues as those presented in the companion case of Sutphin v. Speik, L. A. No. 17142 (ante, p. 195 [99 Pac. (2d) 652]), this day decided. On the authority of that ease the judgment is affirmed.

Edmonds, J., Carter, J., Curtis, J., Waste, C. J., Wood, J., pro tem., and McComb, J., pro tem., concurred.

Rehearing denied. Shenk, J., and Houser, J., did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Speik v. Sutphin, 99 P.2d 656, 15 Cal. 2d 764, 1940 Cal. LEXIS 270 (Cal. 1940).

99 P.2d 656 (Speik v. Sutphin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sutphin v. Speik
99 P.2d 652 (California Supreme Court, 1940)