Speik v. Sutphin

California Supreme Court

Speik v. Sutphin

15 Cal. 2d 764

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 29, 1940

DocketL. A. No. 16530

StatusPublished

This text of 15 Cal. 2d 764 (Speik v. Sutphin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Speik v. Sutphin, 15 Cal. 2d 764 (Cal. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

GIBSON, J.

This is an action to quiet title and to obtain declaratory relief in respect to rights arising under an [765]*765oil lease. The action raises the same issues as those presented in the companion case of Sutphin v. Speik, L. A. No. 17142 (ante, p. 195 [99 Pac. (2d) 652]), this day decided. On the authority of that ease the judgment is affirmed.

Edmonds, J., Carter, J., Curtis, J., Waste, C. J., Wood, J., pro tem., and McComb, J., pro tem., concurred.

Rehearing denied. Shenk, J., and Houser, J., did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GIBSON, J.

This is an action to quiet title and to obtain declaratory relief in respect to rights arising under an [765]*765oil lease. The action raises the same issues as those presented in the companion case of Sutphin v. Speik, L. A. No. 17142 (ante, p. 195 [99 Pac. (2d) 652]), this day decided. On the authority of that ease the judgment is affirmed.

Edmonds, J., Carter, J., Curtis, J., Waste, C. J., Wood, J., pro tem., and McComb, J., pro tem., concurred.

Rehearing denied. Shenk, J., and Houser, J., did not participate.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 Cal. 2d 764, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/speik-v-sutphin-cal-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack