Speight v. State
104 So. 925, 101 So. 925, 20 Ala. App. 696
Opinion
The defendant was convicted of the offense of distilling, and appeals on the record proper, without bill of exceptions. There appearing no prejudicial error, the judgment will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Speight v. State, 104 So. 925, 101 So. 925, 20 Ala. App. 696 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925).
104 So. 925 (Speight v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.