Speidel v. Weiner
19 A.2d 875, 129 N.J. Eq. 434, 1941 N.J. LEXIS 663
Opinion
The decree under review will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Bigelow.
For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, PORTER, COLIE, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, THOMPSON, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Speidel v. Weiner, 19 A.2d 875, 129 N.J. Eq. 434, 1941 N.J. LEXIS 663 (N.J. 1941).
19 A.2d 875 (Speidel v. Weiner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Weinstein v. Swartz
68 A.2d 865 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1949)