Speidel v. Weiner
19 A.2d 875, 129 N.J. Eq. 434, 1941 N.J. LEXIS 663
This text of 19 A.2d 875 (Speidel v. Weiner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Speidel v. Weiner, 19 A.2d 875, 129 N.J. Eq. 434, 1941 N.J. LEXIS 663 (N.J. 1941).
Opinion
The decree under review will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Bigelow.
For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, PORTER, COLIE, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, THOMPSON, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Weinstein v. Swartz
68 A.2d 865 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1949)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
19 A.2d 875, 129 N.J. Eq. 434, 1941 N.J. LEXIS 663, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/speidel-v-weiner-nj-1941.