Speicher v. New York & New Jersey Telephone Co.
41 A. 1116, 60 N.J.L. 242, 31 Vroom 242, 1897 N.J. LEXIS 47
Opinion
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given by that court.
For affirmance—Depue, Gummere, Ludlow, Van Syckel, Bogert, Dayton, Hendrickson, Nixon. 8.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Speicher v. New York & New Jersey Telephone Co., 41 A. 1116, 60 N.J.L. 242, 31 Vroom 242, 1897 N.J. LEXIS 47 (N.J. 1897).
41 A. 1116 (Speicher v. New York & New Jersey Telephone Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.