Speer v. Burns
This text of 34 A. 212 (Speer v. Burns) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A careful consideration of the record in this case, with special reference to the assignments of error, has led us to the con [82]*82elusion that the findings of fact of which the decree is predicated are substantially correct, and that the decree itself is sufficient in both form and substance. There is nothing in any of the specifications of error that requires discussion. Neither of them is sustained.
Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed with costs to be paid by the appellants.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
34 A. 212, 173 Pa. 77, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 661, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/speer-v-burns-pa-1896.