Speer v. Burns

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Speer v. Burns

34 A. 212, 173 Pa. 77, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 661

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 6, 1896·No. Appeal, No. 197·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

A careful consideration of the record in this case, with special reference to the assignments of error, has led us to the con [82] elusion that the findings of fact of which the decree is predicated are substantially correct, and that the decree itself is sufficient in both form and substance. There is nothing in any of the specifications of error that requires discussion. Neither of them is sustained.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed with costs to be paid by the appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

A careful consideration of the record in this case, with special reference to the assignments of error, has led us to the con [82] elusion that the findings of fact of which the decree is predicated are substantially correct, and that the decree itself is sufficient in both form and substance. There is nothing in any of the specifications of error that requires discussion. Neither of them is sustained.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed with costs to be paid by the appellants.

Speer v. Burns, 34 A. 212, 173 Pa. 77, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 661 (Pa. 1896).

Pincite

34 A. 212 (Speer v. Burns) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related