Speer v. Bodenheimer Plumbing Co.

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedJuly 19, 2005
DocketI.C. NO. 288050
StatusPublished

This text of Speer v. Bodenheimer Plumbing Co. (Speer v. Bodenheimer Plumbing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Speer v. Bodenheimer Plumbing Co., (N.C. Super. Ct. 2005).

Opinion

***********
The undersigned have reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Phillips and the briefs and arguments of the parties. The appealing parties have not shown good ground to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, rehear the parties or their representatives, or amend the Opinion and Award.

***********
The Full Commission finds as a fact and concludes as matters of law the following, which were entered into by parties as:

STIPULATIONS
1. The parties were subject to the North Carolina Workers' Compensation Act at all times relevant hereto, the employer employing the requisite number of employees to be bound under the provisions of said Act.

2. An employee-employer relationship existed between the parties at all times relevant hereto.

3. Builders Mutual Insurance Company was the carrier on the risk on the date of decedent's death.

4. On July 31, 2002 decedent died as a result of the extreme conditions under which he was working on that date which precipitated the myocardial infarction, which resulted in his death.

5. Decedent's average weekly wage was $960.58, yielding a workers' compensation rate of $640.39.

6. Decedent's medical records, including family physician records from prior to July 31, 2002 as well as medical records for Sue Speer, the surviving spouse of decedent, were stipulated into evidence as Stipulated Exhibit 1.

7. The issues before the undersigned are (i) whether the deceased plaintiff sustained an injury by accident arising out of and in the course of employment with the employer pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97.2(6) and (10); and (ii) whether Sue Speer, widow, was unable to support herself because of physical disability as of July 31, 2002.

***********
Based upon all of the competent evidence of record the Full Commission makes the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Decedent was born on March 11, 1954 and was 48 years old at the time of his death on July 31, 2002.

2. Since 1997, decedent worked as a plumbing supplies sales associate for Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse.

3. Decedent also owned his own plumbing business since 2001. Decedent devoted approximately ten percent of his time to this business. Decedent was particularly talented in making plumbing parts. Much of his work involved repairing and fabricating plumbing for older, historic homes in the West End section of Winston-Salem. If a plumbing job required that a trench be dug, Decedent would hire someone to dig the trench, by hand or with equipment. He did not typically operate trench-digging equipment.

4. On July 29, 2002, decedent changed jobs and began work for Bodenheimer Plumbing as a plumbing service technician.

5. On Monday, July 29 and 28, 2002, decedent worked with a "buddy" riding around getting accustomed to the work routine.

6. On July 31, 2002, his third day on the job, decedent was assigned to work with Thomas Holder. They were instructed to dig a ditch and lay pipe at a private residence.

7. Thomas Holder arrived at the work site at 5116 Carversham Road, Winston-Salem, between 10:00 a.m. and 10:30 a.m. and found decedent had already begun working on the job. The temperature was approximately 95 degrees and the ground was very hard.

8. Although plumbers with Bodenheimer Plumbing were required to work outdoors on a regular basis and dig in hard soil, the ground was very hard and it was very hot on July 31, 2002. The weather conditions were so intense, the two were required to take frequent rest breaks to cool off and drink fluid.

9. At approximately 12:00 noon, Mr. Holder and decedent took a lunch break for approximately one hour. Prior to the lunch break, decedent had complained of some shoulder pain. After lunch, the two men returned to the same job site and began digging again. The ground was so hard the men had to dig with mattocks in addition to shovels and post-hole diggers. They were unable to use a trencher due to other underground lines in the area. Since the ground was so hard, they were required to break up the soil and then dig it out with a shovel. Although plumbers are required to dig in the ground on a fairly regular basis, it was unusual to encounter such hard ground. Further, this was a new job for plaintiff and he had not grown accustomed to this work yet or established a normal routine.

10. Sometime during the afternoon, decedent began to move his left shoulder in circles, complaining that it hurt him. Mr. Holder instructed decedent to sit down and take a break because the job did not have to be finished that day. Decedent sat down for a short period of time, then got up saying "I gotta rest" then passed out, falling backwards onto the ground. Mr. Holder called decedent's name several times and when he did not respond, Mr. Holder used a cell phone to contact Bodenheimer Plumbing and asked that an ambulance be sent. Decedent died while Mr. Holder was attending to him. Decedent was transported to Forsyth Medical Center where he was pronounced dead at 4:37 p.m.

11. The Full Commission finds that the physical exertion required of decedent was unusual and excessive and, in combination with the environmental elements on July 31, 2002, constitutes an injury by accident pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-2(6) and (10).

12. The final autopsy report completed on August 1, 2001 gave a final diagnosis of sudden death due to severe coronary atherosclerosis and interstitial myocardial fibrosis.

13. Decedent was not an active man. He was overweight and suffered from early onset diabetes and high blood pressure. He had cardiac risk factors, which were being treated, but he was not suffering from any complications from these conditions.

14. On July 26, 2002, only five days prior to his death, decedent underwent a complete physical examination at Brookview Hills Internal Medicine, by Louis Valente, Physician's Assistant. Following the exam, decedent was not instructed to limit his activities. It was recommended that decedent begin an exercise program, but that before doing this, he should have a screening exercise test to better assess his cardiac condition.

15. Decedent had been a patient with Brookview Hills since 2000 for monitoring of his hypertension, non-insulin dependent Type II diabetes diagnosed in 2001, and other general medical concerns. He was taking medication for his diabetes, blood pressure and high cholesterol.

16. Although decedent had cardiac risk factors, he had never complained of chest pain, and on the date of his physical exam reported no chest pain or palpitations. Decedent reported doing well with no complaints, only needing blood pressure, cholesterol and glucose levels checked.

17. Mr. Valente stated to a reasonable degree of medical certainty that the activities decedent was performing at work for Bodenheimer Plumbing on July 31, 2002, precipitated his heart attack.

18. Dr. Wittmer opined that the findings by the pathologist on autopsy, were consistent with an acute cardiac event, either cardiac infarction or fatal arrhythmia related to atherosclerosis, all consistent with what is generally known as a heart attack.

19. Dr. Wittmer testified to a reasonable degree of medical certainty, and it is so found, that given decedent's risk factors for heart disease, the conditions under which he was working on July 31, 2002 precipitated his heart attack and resulting death.

20. Dr.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hedrick v. Southland Corp.
255 S.E.2d 198 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Speer v. Bodenheimer Plumbing Co., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/speer-v-bodenheimer-plumbing-co-ncworkcompcom-2005.