Speegle v. Leese

51 Cal. 415, 1876 Cal. LEXIS 64
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1876·No. No. 5009·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

By the Court, Crockett, J.:

The controlling issue made by the pleadings was upon the question whether the plaintiff or defendant received a majority of the legal votes cast at the election. The court below wholly omitted to find upon this issue, and if the fact be that no evidence on this point was introduced, either by the plaintiff or defendant, this does not excuse the want of a finding. It is the duty of the trial court to find upon all the material issues made by the pleadings, whether evidence be introduced or not, and if there be no finding on a material issue, the judgment cannot be supported.

Judgment reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial.

Mr. Chief Justice Wallace did not express an opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Speegle v. Leese, 51 Cal. 415, 1876 Cal. LEXIS 64 (Cal. 1876).

51 Cal. 415 (Speegle v. Leese) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Morrow v. Morrow
201 Cal. App. 2d 235 (California Court of Appeal, 1962)
Roncelli v. Fugazi
186 P. 373 (California Court of Appeal, 1919)
Trull v. the Independent Order of Puritans
181 P. 89 (California Court of Appeal, 1919)
Mitchell v. Jensen
81 P. 165 (Utah Supreme Court, 1905)
Kusel v. Kusel
81 P. 297 (California Supreme Court, 1905)
Gull River Lumber Co. v. School District No. 39
48 N.W. 427 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1890)
Monterey County v. Cushing
23 P. 700 (California Supreme Court, 1890)
Connolly v. Hingley
23 P. 273 (California Supreme Court, 1890)
Bryan v. Tormey
21 P. 725 (California Supreme Court, 1889)
Leviston v.Ryan
17 P. 239 (California Supreme Court, 1888)
Golson v. Dunlap
14 P. 576 (California Supreme Court, 1887)