Speed v. United States

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedJanuary 9, 2014
Docket20-1399
StatusUnpublished

This text of Speed v. United States (Speed v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Speed v. United States, (Fed. Cir. 2014).

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

CONSTANCE R. SPEED, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee. ______________________

2013-5079 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 10-CV-0125, Judge Charles F. Lettow. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

VICTORIA PLANTE-NORTHINGTON, Plante Law Firm, P.C. of Houston, Texas, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

TARA K. HOGAN, Senior Trial Counsel, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Depart- ment of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant- appellee. With her on the brief were STUART F. DELERY, Assistant Attorney General, JEANNE E. DAVIDSON, Direc- tor, and MARTIN F. HOCKEY, JR., Assistant Director. Of counsel on the brief was MORGAN E. REHRIG, Attorney, Office of General Counsel, United States Postal Service, of Washington, DC. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, PROST, and CHEN, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 9, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Speed v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/speed-v-united-states-cafc-2014.