Speed v. United States
This text of Speed v. United States (Speed v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
CONSTANCE R. SPEED, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee. ______________________
2013-5079 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 10-CV-0125, Judge Charles F. Lettow. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
VICTORIA PLANTE-NORTHINGTON, Plante Law Firm, P.C. of Houston, Texas, argued for plaintiff-appellant.
TARA K. HOGAN, Senior Trial Counsel, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Depart- ment of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant- appellee. With her on the brief were STUART F. DELERY, Assistant Attorney General, JEANNE E. DAVIDSON, Direc- tor, and MARTIN F. HOCKEY, JR., Assistant Director. Of counsel on the brief was MORGAN E. REHRIG, Attorney, Office of General Counsel, United States Postal Service, of Washington, DC. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, PROST, and CHEN, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
January 9, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Speed v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/speed-v-united-states-cafc-2014.