Speed v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Speed v. State

102 So. 926, 20 Ala. App. 696

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 20, 1925

Docket6 Div. 604.

StatusPublished

This text of 102 So. 926 (Speed v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Speed v. State, 102 So. 926, 20 Ala. App. 696 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

In the absence of a bill of exceptions, the ruling of the court, denying defendant in the court below a new trial, is not presented for the consideration of this court. Prom a conviction for the offense of grand larceny the defendant appealed. He was sentenced to serve an indeterminate term of imprisonment in the penitentiary of not less than four years or more than ten years. This appeal is upon the record proper, and, as no error appears thereon, the judgment of conviction in'the circuit court must be affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

In the absence of a bill of exceptions, the ruling of the court, denying defendant in the court below a new trial, is not presented for the consideration of this court. Prom a conviction for the offense of grand larceny the defendant appealed. He was sentenced to serve an indeterminate term of imprisonment in the penitentiary of not less than four years or more than ten years. This appeal is upon the record proper, and, as no error appears thereon, the judgment of conviction in'the circuit court must be affirmed. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

102 So. 926, 20 Ala. App. 696, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/speed-v-state-alactapp-1925.