Speed v. Merit Systems Protection Board
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2007-3257
CONSTANCE R. SPEED,
Petitioner,
v.
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD,
Respondent,
and
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE,
Intervenor.
Kenneth M. Plaisance, of New Orleans, Louisiana, argued for petitioner.
Calvin M. Morrow, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, Merit Systems Protection Board, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With him on the brief were B. Chad Bungard, General Counsel; and Rosa M. Koppel, Deputy General Counsel.
Allison Kidd-Miller, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, for intervenor. With her on the brief were Jeanne E. Davidson, Director; and Todd M. Hughes, Deputy Director.
Appealed from: Merit Systems Protection Board NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2007-3257
Judgment ON APPEAL from the Merit Systems Protection Board
in CASE NO(S). DA0353060594-I-1
This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
Per Curiam (MICHEL, Chief Judge, LINN, Circuit Judge, and Zagel*, District Judge).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATED June 6, 2008 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk
*Honorable James B. Zagel, District Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Speed v. Merit Systems Protection Board (Speed v. Merit Systems Protection Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.