Speed v. Ferris

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Speed v. Ferris

39 So. 3d 349, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 7513, 2010 WL 2134128

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 28, 2010

Docket2D08-1222

StatusPublished

This text of 39 So. 3d 349 (Speed v. Ferris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Speed v. Ferris, 39 So. 3d 349, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 7513, 2010 WL 2134128 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Katherine Speed challenges multiple provisions of the final judgment that dissolved her marriage to Greg Ferris. After a thorough review of the record, we find no reversible error and we affirm the final judgment on the merits. However, we dismiss as premature the portion of the appeal relating to the trial court’s determination that Mr. Ferris is entitled to attorney’s fees. See Zuberer v. Zuberer, 28 So.3d 993, 993-94 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (“The trial court’s ruling addressed only entitlement to fees; the issue is not ripe for appeal until it determines the amount.” (citing McIlveen v. McIlveen, 644 So.2d 612, 612 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994))); Consumer Lightning Prods., Inc. v. Allen Enters., Inc., 911 So.2d 884, 884 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005).

Affirmed in part and dismissed in part.

ALTENBERND, DAVIS, and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Katherine Speed challenges multiple provisions of the final judgment that dissolved her marriage to Greg Ferris. After a thorough review of the record, we find no reversible error and we affirm the final judgment on the merits. However, we dismiss as premature the portion of the appeal relating to the trial court’s determination that Mr. Ferris is entitled to attorney’s fees. See Zuberer v. Zuberer, 28 So.3d 993, 993-94 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (“The trial court’s ruling addressed only entitlement to fees; the issue is not ripe for appeal until it determines the amount.” (citing McIlveen v. McIlveen, 644 So.2d 612, 612 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994))); Consumer Lightning Prods., Inc. v. Allen Enters., Inc., 911 So.2d 884, 884 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005).

Affirmed in part and dismissed in part.

ALTENBERND, DAVIS, and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

39 So. 3d 349, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 7513, 2010 WL 2134128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/speed-v-ferris-fladistctapp-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack