Speed v. DeLibero
565 A.2d 537, 212 Conn. 813, 1989 Conn. LEXIS 285
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Speed v. DeLibero. Read the opinion of the Court — 215 Conn. 308 →
Opinion
The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 19 Conn. App. 95, is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court err in concluding that the plaintiffs had demonstrated as a matter of law that juror misconduct had probably prejudiced them and that a new trial was necessary?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Speed v. DeLibero, 565 A.2d 537, 212 Conn. 813, 1989 Conn. LEXIS 285 (Colo. 1989).
565 A.2d 537 (Speed v. DeLibero) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Speed v. DeLibero
561 A.2d 959 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1989)