Spectrum Systems International Corp. v. Chemical Bank
588 N.E.2d 95, 79 N.Y.2d 850, 580 N.Y.S.2d 197, 1992 N.Y. LEXIS 304
This text of 588 N.E.2d 95 (Spectrum Systems International Corp. v. Chemical Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Spectrum Systems International Corp. v. Chemical Bank, 588 N.E.2d 95, 79 N.Y.2d 850, 580 N.Y.S.2d 197, 1992 N.Y. LEXIS 304 (N.Y. 1992).
Opinion
Motion to amend remittitur dismissed as untimely (22 NYCRR 500.11 [g] [3]; see, Drzewinski v Atlantic Scafford & Ladder Co., 70 NY2d 999). [See, 78 NY2d 371.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Spectrum Systems International v. Chemical Bank
581 N.E.2d 1055 (New York Court of Appeals, 1991)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
588 N.E.2d 95, 79 N.Y.2d 850, 580 N.Y.S.2d 197, 1992 N.Y. LEXIS 304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spectrum-systems-international-corp-v-chemical-bank-ny-1992.