Spectrum Health v. Titan Ins. Co.
This text of 781 N.W.2d 575 (Spectrum Health v. Titan Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SPECTRUM HEALTH and Orthopaedic Associates of Grand Rapids, P.C., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
TITAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-/Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, and
Brandy Zoerman, Third-Party Defendant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
*576 Order
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 20, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MARKMAN, J. (dissenting).
I respectfully dissent from this Court's order denying defendant's application for leave to appeal for the reasons set forth in my dissent from the order denying defendant's motion for reconsideration of our earlier order denying leave to appeal in Detroit Medical Ctr. v. Titan Ins. Co., 485 Mich. 1008, 775 N.W.2d 755 (2009) (reported below: 284 Mich.App. 490, 775 N.W.2d 151 [2009]), recon. den. ___ Mich. ___, 781 N.W.2d 574 (2010).
CORRIGAN, J, joins the statement of MARKMAN, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
781 N.W.2d 575, 486 Mich. 912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spectrum-health-v-titan-ins-co-mich-2010.