Spectrum Dynamics Medical Limited v. General Electric Company

• Court: District Court, S.D. New York
• Decided: January 6, 2022
• Docket: 1:18-cv-11386
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

1 HOMP S ON ATLANTA CINCINNATI COLUMBUS NEW YORK HIN E CHICAGO CLEVELAND DAYTON WASHINGTON, D.C. APPLICATION GRANTED SO ORDERED Aan January 4, 2022 VERNON S. BRODERICK U.S.D.J. 01/06/2022 VIA ECF Defendants are directed to Rule 5.B. of my Individual Hon. Vernon S. Broderick Rules & Practices in Civil Cases and to meet and □□□□□□□ United States District Court with Plaintiff as necessary to determine if the Sur-reply Southern District of New York O ition to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminar Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse Pposil . . □□□□ Injunction and supporting materials can be filed in 40 Foley Square, Room 415 New York, New York 10007 redacted form on ECF. Re: Spectrum Dynamics Medical Limited v. General Electric Company, et al., Case No.: 18-cv-11386 (VSB) Dear Judge Broderick: We represent Defendants in the above-referenced action. We write pursuant to Rule 5.B of Your Honor’s Individual Practices in Civil Cases to respectfully request permission to file under seal Defendants’ Sur-reply in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction, the Declaration of Marla R. Butler in Support of Sur-reply in Opposition to Plaintiff?s Motion for Preliminary Injunction, and Exhibits 442 to 449, which are being filed today, January 4, 2022, and contain information the parties have designated Highly Confidential or Confidential under the parties’ Stipulated Confidentiality and Protective Order (the “Protective Order’) (Dkt. 156). The presumption of public access to judicial documents can be overcome if countervailing factors warrant confidentiality. See Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 120 (2d Cir. 2006); see also Nixon vy. Warner Commc’ns Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 598 (1978). Sealing of records may be justified to preserve “higher values,” including the need to protect an entity from competitive injury. Lugosch, 435 F.3d at 124; see also Tropical Sails Corp. v. Yext, Inc., No. 14- cv-7582, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49029, at *10-11 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 12) (risk of “competitive injury is sufficiently serious to warrant protection” of proprietary business information). Consistent with this, courts routinely permit sealing and redaction of competitively sensitive proprietary business information or information subject to a claim of privilege. See, e.g., Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. Sunny Merch. Corp., 97 F. Supp. 3d 485, 511 (S.D.N.Y. 2015); Encyclopedia Brown Prods., Ltd. v. Home Box Office. Inc., 26 F. Supp. 2d 606, 614 (S.D.N.Y. 1998); see also Nixon, 435 U.S. at 598 (recognizing need to seal information that might “harm a litigant’s competitive standing”). Here, Defendants’ Sur-reply, supporting declaration, and exhibits contain references to information that is assertedly competitively sensitive and proprietary information of one or both parties and, if disclosed, could pose a substantial risk of harm. This is the sort of sensitive information that courts consistently protect from disclosure. See, e.g., Ferring B.V. y. Allergan, Inc., No. 12-cv-2650, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 150239, at *16(S.D.N.Y. Sep. 7) (sealing documents containing proprietary information); Encyclopedia Brown, 26 F. Supp. 2d at 612 (sealing documents reflecting sensitive trade secret information).

Marla.Butler@ThompsonHine.com Fax: 404.541.2905 Phone: 404.407.3680 THOMPSON HINE LLP Two Alliance Center www. IhompsonHine.com ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3560 Lenox Road, Suite 1600 Phone: 404.541.2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30326-4266 Fax: 404.541.2905

‘THOMPSON ~ HINE

Page 2 For these reasons, Defendants respectfully request permission to file under seal Defendants’ Sur-reply in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction, the Declaration of Marla R. Butler in Support of Sur-reply in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction, and Exhibits 442 to 449, Very truly yours, /s/ Marla R. Butler THOMPSON HINE LLP Marla R. Butler Carl Wesolowski (pro hac vice) Jesse Jenike-Godshalk (pro hac vice) Two Alliance Center 312 Walnut Street, Suite 2000 3560 Lenox Road NE, Suite 1600 Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 Atlanta, Georgia 30326 Tel.: (513) 352-6700 Tel.: (404) 541-2900 Fax: (513) 241-4771 Fax: (404) 541-2905 Jesse.Godshalk @ ThompsonHine.com Marla.Butler@ ThompsonHine.com Carl. Wesolowski@ThompsonHine.com Brian Lanciault Jeffrey Metzcar 335 Madison Avenue, 12th Floor Discovery Place New York, New York 10017 10050 Innovation Drive Tel.: (212) 344-5680 Miamisburg, Ohio 45342 Fax: (212) 344-6101 Tel. (937) 443-6841 Brian.Lanciault @ ThompsonHine.com Fax (937) 430-3781 Jeff.Metzcar@thompsonhine.com Attorneys for Defendants General Electric Company, GE Healthcare, Inc., GE Medical Systems Israel Ltd., Jean- Paul Bouhnik, Sergio Steinfeld, Arie Escho, and Nathan Hermony and for Non- Party Yaron Hefetz cc: All Counsel of Record via ECF