Spector Motor Service, Inc. v. Messner

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Spector Motor Service, Inc. v. Messner

100 A.2d 924, 375 Pa. 473

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedNovember 17, 1953

DocketAppeal, No. 29

StatusPublished

This text of 100 A.2d 924 (Spector Motor Service, Inc. v. Messner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Spector Motor Service, Inc. v. Messner, 100 A.2d 924, 375 Pa. 473 (Pa. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cueiam,

Spector Motor Service, Inc., a foreign corporation engaged in an interstate trucking business, contends that the Act of June 22, 1931, P. L. 694, as amended by the Act of December 27, 1951, P. L. 1761, 72 PS §2185 et seq., is unconstitutional as applied to it for [474]*474all of the reasons which were alleged by Shirks Motor Express Corporation and Interstate Motor Freight System, Inc., in similar proceedings and appeals at No. 22 May Term, 1953 and at No. 25 May Term, 1953, respectively. The three appeals were heard by us at the same sitting. This appellant makes no argument or contention which differs from those presented and considered by us in the companion Shirks and Interstate cases, opinion and order in which were this day filed. For the reasons stated in those cases, the decree of the court below is affirmed at the cost of appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

Pee Cueiam,

Spector Motor Service, Inc., a foreign corporation engaged in an interstate trucking business, contends that the Act of June 22, 1931, P. L. 694, as amended by the Act of December 27, 1951, P. L. 1761, 72 PS §2185 et seq., is unconstitutional as applied to it for [474]*474all of the reasons which were alleged by Shirks Motor Express Corporation and Interstate Motor Freight System, Inc., in similar proceedings and appeals at No. 22 May Term, 1953 and at No. 25 May Term, 1953, respectively. The three appeals were heard by us at the same sitting. This appellant makes no argument or contention which differs from those presented and considered by us in the companion Shirks and Interstate cases, opinion and order in which were this day filed. For the reasons stated in those cases, the decree of the court below is affirmed at the cost of appellant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

100 A.2d 924, 375 Pa. 473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spector-motor-service-inc-v-messner-pa-1953.