Speck v. Hettinger

4 A. 168, 2 Sadler 474
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 17, 1886·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The assignment of the policy of insurance was made to the defendants jointly. Jointly they received the money thereon, ■and they executed a joint receipt therefor. It matters not that, as between themselves, they held separate interests acquired at different times and from different persons. The right of recovery against them does not depend upon the way or manner in which they obtained the assignment of the policy, but upon their subsequent receipt of the money.

What they stated or desired at the time they received the money does not change their legal liability consequent upon their joint receipt thereof.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Speck v. Hettinger, 4 A. 168, 2 Sadler 474 (Pa. 1886).

4 A. 168 (Speck v. Hettinger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Secor
281 N.W. 178 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1938)