Speck v. Bates
This text of Speck v. Bates (Speck v. Bates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
ULRICH SPECK, Appellant
v.
BRIAN L. BATES, ANTHONY O. RAGHEB, JOSEPH M. STEWART, IV, WILLIAM J. BOURDEAU, BRIAN D. CHOULES, JAMES D. PURDY, NEAL E. FEARNOT, Appellees ______________________
2016-1879 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 106,044. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
BRYAN PATRICK COLLINS, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, McLean, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by JACK S. BARUFKA, ROBERT M. FUHRER.
CHRISTOPHER A. BROWN, Woodard, Emhardt, Mori- arty, McNett & Henry LLP, Indianapolis, IN, argued for appellees. Also represented by WILLIAM ALEX MCKENNA. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (WALLACH, HUGHES, and STOLL, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
February 13, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Speck v. Bates, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/speck-v-bates-cafc-2017.