Specialty Sales Corp. v. Katz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Specialty Sales Corp. v. Katz

231 A.D. 797

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1930

StatusPublished

This text of 231 A.D. 797 (Specialty Sales Corp. v. Katz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Specialty Sales Corp. v. Katz, 231 A.D. 797 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs to abide the event, upon the ground that the contract was made and was to be performed in Rensselaer county; that the only disinterested witness on either side resides in that county; and that the affidavits in opposition to the motion disregard, both as to form and substance, most of the established rules relating to such papers and, therefore, fail to disclose any facts which might warrant a denial of the motion. All concur. Present-—Sears, P. J., Crouch, Taylor, Edgcomb and Crosby, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs to abide the event, upon the ground that the contract was made and was to be performed in Rensselaer county; that the only disinterested witness on either side resides in that county; and that the affidavits in opposition to the motion disregard, both as to form and substance, most of the established rules relating to such papers and, therefore, fail to disclose any facts which might warrant a denial of the motion. All concur. Present-—Sears, P. J., Crouch, Taylor, Edgcomb and Crosby, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

231 A.D. 797, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/specialty-sales-corp-v-katz-nyappdiv-1930.