Specialty Associates, Inc. v. United States

34 Cust. Ct. 514
United States Customs Court·Decided June 8, 1955·No. Reap. Dec. 8446; Entry Nos. 963375; 964908; 778984·Published

Opinion

Lawrence, Judge:

There was no appearance on behalf of the appealing party when the above-enumerated appeals for a reap-praisement were called for hearing.

Rule 5 of the rules of this court provides that—

* * * Where the plaintiff, petitioner, or appellant, or his attorney, in a case does not appear when the same is called, and after the opposite party has had opportunity to present evidence on the issues, it shall be deemed submitted and shall be decided by the court on the record as it appears therein.

In conformity with the requirements of the rule, I have examined the record in the appeals before the court and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold, therefore, that the proper values of the merchandise are the values returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Specialty Associates, Inc. v. United States, 34 Cust. Ct. 514 (cusc 1955).

34 Cust. Ct. 514 (Specialty Associates, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.