Specialists Entertainment, Inc. v. Moore

115 A.D.3d 424, 981 N.Y.S.2d 512
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 4, 2014·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[425] Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Saliann Scarpulla, J.), entered on or about September 20, 2013, which, to the extent appealed from, granted plaintiffs cross motion to amend its complaint to add a claim for breach of contract as a third-party beneficiary as against defendant Sony Music Holdings, Inc., unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the cross motion denied, and the complaint dismissed. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

Plaintiff cannot assert a claim as a third-party beneficiary of a letter agreement between defendants Moore and Sony. The agreement, requesting and authorizing Sony to deduct a portion of royalties payable to Moore and to pay them directly to plaintiff, by its express terms, negates any intent to permit enforcement by third parties (see Mendel v Henry Phipps Plaza W., Inc., 6 NY3d 783, 786 [2006]; Board of Mgrs. of Alexandria Condominium v Broadway/72nd Assoc., 285 AD2d 422, 424 [1st Dept 2001]).

Concur — Tom, J.P, Friedman, Acosta, Andrias and Richter, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Specialists Entertainment, Inc. v. Moore, 115 A.D.3d 424, 981 N.Y.S.2d 512 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

115 A.D.3d 424 (Specialists Entertainment, Inc. v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Freidman v. New York City Taxi & Limousine Commission
139 A.D.3d 405 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)