Special Wayne Prosecutor v. Recorder's Court Judges

Michigan Supreme Court

Special Wayne Prosecutor v. Recorder's Court Judges

409 Mich. 1119, 1980 Mich. LEXIS 1521

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 28, 1980

DocketDocket No. 66026

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 409 Mich. 1119 (Special Wayne Prosecutor v. Recorder's Court Judges) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Special Wayne Prosecutor v. Recorder's Court Judges, 409 Mich. 1119, 1980 Mich. LEXIS 1521 (Mich. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

The complaint for superintending control in the nature of mandamus is considered. Pursuant to GCR 1963, 865.1(7), it is ordered that the elected judges of the Common Pleas Court of Detroit select a judge from their number by process of blind draw to conduct the preliminary examination in the case of People v Townsend (Recorder’s Court Docket No. 80-06994). The State Court Administrator shall be advised of the name of the judge so selected and he shall forthwith assign that judge for the purpose described. This action is taken solely to preclude even the possibility [1120]*1120of public concern over the impartiality of the forum and should not be construed as a finding of partiality or bias on the part of any of the judges of the Recorder’s Court for the City of Detroit. See Wayne County Board of Comm’rs v Wayne Circuit Judges, 403 Mich 860 (1978). The motion for stay becomes moot and is denied. We retain no jurisdiction.

Ivan E. Barris and David F. DuMouchel, Special Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys, for plaintiff Special Wayne Prosecutor. Cornelius Pitts for defendant Leonard Townsend.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The complaint for superintending control in the nature of mandamus is considered. Pursuant to GCR 1963, 865.1(7), it is ordered that the elected judges of the Common Pleas Court of Detroit select a judge from their number by process of blind draw to conduct the preliminary examination in the case of People v Townsend (Recorder’s Court Docket No. 80-06994). The State Court Administrator shall be advised of the name of the judge so selected and he shall forthwith assign that judge for the purpose described. This action is taken solely to preclude even the possibility [1120]*1120of public concern over the impartiality of the forum and should not be construed as a finding of partiality or bias on the part of any of the judges of the Recorder’s Court for the City of Detroit. See Wayne County Board of Comm’rs v Wayne Circuit Judges, 403 Mich 860 (1978). The motion for stay becomes moot and is denied. We retain no jurisdiction.

Ivan E. Barris and David F. DuMouchel, Special Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys, for plaintiff Special Wayne Prosecutor. Cornelius Pitts for defendant Leonard Townsend.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

409 Mich. 1119, 1980 Mich. LEXIS 1521, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/special-wayne-prosecutor-v-recorders-court-judges-mich-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack