Special Disability Trust Fund v. Nelson's Florist

301 So. 2d 761
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedSeptember 25, 1974
DocketNo. 44933
StatusPublished

This text of 301 So. 2d 761 (Special Disability Trust Fund v. Nelson's Florist) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Special Disability Trust Fund v. Nelson's Florist, 301 So. 2d 761 (Fla. 1974).

Opinion

DEKLE, Justice.

This is another dismissal of an appeal by the IRC for failure to deposit cost of transcript in compliance with IRC Rule 6(b) (now Rule 23). See Vogel v. City of Coral Gables, Fla., 298 So.2d 389, filed July 26, 1974.

Again we recognize the requirements of the rule which should be upheld but in the present instance the JIC had expressly relieved the appellant of the deposit requirement in writing upon good cause shown.

Accordingly, there is no breach of the rule which will support a dismissal of the appeal and certiorari must be granted. The cause is therefore remanded for consideration on appeal by the IRC where the transcript and briefs are already on file.

It is so ordered.

ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vogel v. City of Coral Gables
298 So. 2d 389 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
301 So. 2d 761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/special-disability-trust-fund-v-nelsons-florist-fla-1974.