Special Disability Trust Fund v. Metropolitan Dade County
This text of 393 So. 2d 6 (Special Disability Trust Fund v. Metropolitan Dade County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
AFFIRMED. The Fund’s objection to the joint petition did not divest the Judge of Industrial Claims of jurisdiction to enter a Joint Petition Order. See Special Disability Trust Fund v. Kemp & Guest [7]*7Roofing and Risk Management Services, Inc., 379 So.2d 404 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). As to the issue of whether the Judge properly found that the lump sum settlement was in the best interest of the claimant, the Fund is not bound by that finding, Kemp, 379 So.2d at 406, and thus has no standing to challenge that finding on this appeal. Additionally, the Fund’s rights to due process were not violated. See Goldberger v. Wolfie’s Restaurant, 8 FCR 210 (1973), cert. den. 291 So.2d 615 (Fla.1974).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
393 So. 2d 6, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/special-disability-trust-fund-v-metropolitan-dade-county-fladistctapp-1980.