Spears v. Tallassee Power Co.

107 S.E. 442, 181 N.C. 447, 1921 N.C. LEXIS 101
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 3, 1921
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 107 S.E. 442 (Spears v. Tallassee Power Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Spears v. Tallassee Power Co., 107 S.E. 442, 181 N.C. 447, 1921 N.C. LEXIS 101 (N.C. 1921).

Opinion

Allen, J.

There are ten assignments of error, but all of them are abandoned because not considered in the brief of appellant (Allen v. Reidsville, 178 N. C., 513) except one, which is to a statement of a contention of the parties, and this exception is disposed of by the record, which says, “No objection was made .or exception taken at the time the "judge was charging the jury,” and not until the case on appeal was settled.

An objection to a statement of a contention must be made at the time, and comes too late after verdict. Price v. Edwards, 178 N. C., 503; Hall v. Giessell, 179 N. C., 657.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. . Steele
130 S.E. 308 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1925)
Jordan v. Interurban Motor Lines, Inc.
109 S.E. 566 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
107 S.E. 442, 181 N.C. 447, 1921 N.C. LEXIS 101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spears-v-tallassee-power-co-nc-1921.