Spears v. Tallassee Power Co.

107 S.E. 442, 181 N.C. 447, 1921 N.C. LEXIS 101
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided June 3, 1921·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Allen, J.

There are ten assignments of error, but all of them are abandoned because not considered in the brief of appellant (Allen v. Reidsville, 178 N. C., 513) except one, which is to a statement of a contention of the parties, and this exception is disposed of by the record, which says, “No objection was made .or exception taken at the time the "judge was charging the jury,” and not until the case on appeal was settled.

An objection to a statement of a contention must be made at the time, and comes too late after verdict. Price v. Edwards, 178 N. C., 503; Hall v. Giessell, 179 N. C., 657.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spears v. Tallassee Power Co., 107 S.E. 442, 181 N.C. 447, 1921 N.C. LEXIS 101 (N.C. 1921).

107 S.E. 442 (Spears v. Tallassee Power Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. . Steele
130 S.E. 308 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1925)
Jordan v. Interurban Motor Lines, Inc.
109 S.E. 566 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1921)