Spears v. Florence Magistrate Court

470 F. App'x 172
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 20, 2012·No. No. 12-1025·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Edward R. Spears appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Spears v. Florence Magistrate Court, No. 4:11-cv-01717-TLW, 2011 WL 4943937 (D.S.C. Oct. 17, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spears v. Florence Magistrate Court, 470 F. App'x 172 (4th Cir. 2012).

470 F. App'x 172 (Spears v. Florence Magistrate Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related