Home/Supreme Court of South Carolina/Spearman v. F. S. Royster Guano Co.

Spearman v. F. S. Royster Guano Co.

199 S.E. 530, 188 S.C. 393, 1938 S.C. LEXIS 173
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedOctober 31, 1938
Docket14760
StatusPublished
Cited by18 cases

This text of 199 S.E. 530 (Spearman v. F. S. Royster Guano Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Spearman v. F. S. Royster Guano Co., 199 S.E. 530, 188 S.C. 393, 1938 S.C. LEXIS 173 (S.C. 1938).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. ChiEE Justice; Stabler.

*408 The appeal in this case is from an order of the Circuit Court affirming an award of the South Carolina Industrial Commission. In his well-prepared decree, as will be seen, Judge Sease, by whom the matter was heard, gave much thought and full consideration to the several questions involved in the controversy; and this Court is entirely satisfied, from a careful examination of the record, with the conclusions reached by him.

The Circuit decree, which will be reported, is affirmed.

Messrs. Justices Bonham, Baker and Fishburne concur. Mr. Justice Carter did not participate on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dodd v. Exide Battery
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2005
Hartzell v. State Board of Examiners in Psychology
265 S.E.2d 265 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1980)
Brown v. Brown
123 S.E.2d 772 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1962)
Walker v. City Motor Car Co.
102 S.E.2d 373 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1958)
Leonard v. Georgetown County
95 S.E.2d 777 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1956)
Malphrus v. State Commission of Forestry & Workmen's Compensation Fund
69 S.E.2d 70 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1952)
Sligh v. Pacific Mills
35 S.E.2d 713 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1945)
Smith v. Southern Builders
24 S.E.2d 109 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1943)
Cromer v. Newberry Cotton Mills
23 S.E.2d 19 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1942)
Riddle v. Fairforest Finishing Co.
18 S.E.2d 341 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1942)
Green v. City of Bennettsville
15 S.E.2d 334 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1941)
Cokeley v. Robert Lee, Inc.
14 S.E.2d 889 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1941)
Owens v. Ocean Forest Club, Inc.
12 S.E.2d 839 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1941)
Ingram v. Liberty Mutual Insurance
10 S.E.2d 99 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1940)
Ham v. Mullins Lumber Co.
7 S.E.2d 712 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1940)
Layton v. Hammond-Brown-Jennings Co.
3 S.E.2d 492 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1939)
Rice v. Brandon Corporation
2 S.E.2d 740 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1939)
Rudd v. Fairforest Finishing Co.
200 S.E. 727 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
199 S.E. 530, 188 S.C. 393, 1938 S.C. LEXIS 173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spearman-v-f-s-royster-guano-co-sc-1938.