Spearing v. Hodge Fence & Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Spearing v. Hodge Fence & Lumber Co.

41 So. 215, 116 La. 938, 1906 La. LEXIS 596

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMarch 26, 1906

DocketNo. 15,675

StatusPublished

This text of 41 So. 215 (Spearing v. Hodge Fence & Lumber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Spearing v. Hodge Fence & Lumber Co., 41 So. 215, 116 La. 938, 1906 La. LEXIS 596 (La. 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

BREAUX, C. J.

The views expressed in Stoker v. Hodge Fence & Lumber Company, Limited (La.) 41 South. 211,¹ having been reconsidered, the conclusion arrived at is the same as in the cited case, except as to the amount of damages, which is less by reason of the fact that plaintiff in this case did not suffer injuries to the extent found that plaintiff had suffered in the cited ease.

For these reasons, the law and the evidence being in favor of the plaintiff, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BREAUX, C. J.

The views expressed in Stoker v. Hodge Fence & Lumber Company, Limited (La.) 41 South. 211,¹ having been reconsidered, the conclusion arrived at is the same as in the cited case, except as to the amount of damages, which is less by reason of the fact that plaintiff in this case did not suffer injuries to the extent found that plaintiff had suffered in the cited ease.

For these reasons, the law and the evidence being in favor of the plaintiff, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 So. 215, 116 La. 938, 1906 La. LEXIS 596, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spearing-v-hodge-fence-lumber-co-la-1906.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack