Spear v. Haggarty
This text of 163 Ill. App. 27 (Spear v. Haggarty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
Recovery was had for $83, being rent for an apartment for two months and part of a third.
The only defense interposed was that the apartment had not been renovated as required by the terms of the lease.
The trial was had before the court and a jury, the court, however, directing the jury to find a verdict for the plaintiff.
No question of law is involved. We have examined the record and find nothing in it to justify the claim of the defendant that the clause of the lease which provided that the flat should be thoroughly renovated had not been complied with.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
163 Ill. App. 27, 1911 Ill. App. LEXIS 380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spear-v-haggarty-illappct-1911.