Spear v. Fitchpatrick

37 Iowa 127
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided December 15, 1873·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Cole, J.

It clearly appears from the statement of the ease in the abstract, and also from the bill of exceptions signed by the judge, that the judgment in this case was rendered and entered in vacation, and there is no showing of any consent by the parties, or of any order made during term therefor. In such case and without regard to the merits, it is our duty to reverse the judgment; this point was directly so ruled and acted upon in Townsley v. Morehead, 9 Iowa, 565; see, also, as bearing upon the point indirectly, Luse v. The City of Des Moines, 22 id. 590; Rowley & Co. v. Baugh, Mayor, etc., 33 id. 201. Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spear v. Fitchpatrick, 37 Iowa 127 (iowa 1873).

37 Iowa 127 (Spear v. Fitchpatrick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Simmons v. Dolan
119 N.W. 690 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1909)