Spear Box Co. v. Perlmutter

191 Misc. 1005, 80 N.Y.S.2d 244, 1948 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2524
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided May 13, 1948·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In a summary proceeding for nonpayment of rent under the emergency statute the landlord is required (L. 1945, ch. 3, § 6) to plead and prove that the rent charged is not greater than the emergency rent or such greater rent therefor as may have been fixed by section 4 of the act.

In this instance while the landlord pleaded that the rent charged is not greater than the emergency rent, and that allegation was admitted by the tenant’s failure to deny it, there was no proof of the allegation.

In a summary proceeding for nonpayment of rent a subtenant is entitled to pay the rent, and thus defeat the proceeding (Peck v. Ingersoll, 7 N. Y. 528; Sokolow v. Meyer, 139 Misc. 424), and in the absence of proof of the emergency rental clearly the landlord made out no case.

The final order should be reversed, with $30 costs, and petition dismissed, with costs, without prejudice to a new proceeding.

Hammer, Hofstadter, and Hecht, JJ., concur.

Final order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spear Box Co. v. Perlmutter, 191 Misc. 1005, 80 N.Y.S.2d 244, 1948 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2524 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).

191 Misc. 1005 (Spear Box Co. v. Perlmutter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ruth v. Graceform-Camlin Corset Co.
3 Misc. 2d 787 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1956)