Speach v. Smith
This text of 46 A.D.2d 1001 (Speach v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment unanimously modified, on the law and facts, in accordance with memorandum and as modified affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: The commissioners found upon sufficient evidence that the subject property was zoned Residential A, that it had little value for single residence use and that a reasonable probability existed of rezoning to Residential RB-1 for development with apartment buildings. Although the city’s appraiser valued on a per dwelling unit basis, he offered a square foot valuation at the hearing, the same cost unit utilized by the property owner’s appraiser. The final value found by the commission was within the experts’ range of value and gave consideration to the probability of rezoning. While the methodology by which the appraisers found a land value based upon prospective zoning and then reduced it to reflect the present zoning is not preferred, it is acceptable in this case in view of the admitted difficulty in finding residential comparables and the explanation by the commission of its calculations (Norris v. State of New York, 42 A D 2d 839; see Yochmowitz v. State of New York, 25 A D 2d 930, mot. for lv. to app. den. 18 N Y 2d 579). However, the commissioners improperly added a 30% increment to the land value to reflect rezoning and this resulted in the probability of rezoning being considered twice. We therefore conclude that the award should be modified to $653,850. (Appeal from judgment of Onondaga Special Term in condemnation proceeding.) Present — Marsh, P. J., Witmer, Cardamone, Simons and Mahoney, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
46 A.D.2d 1001, 361 N.Y.S.2d 790, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/speach-v-smith-nyappdiv-1974.