Spaulding v. Yarbrough

1914 OK 206, 140 P. 782, 40 Okla. 731, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 131
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedMay 5, 1914
Docket5096
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 1914 OK 206 (Spaulding v. Yarbrough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Spaulding v. Yarbrough, 1914 OK 206, 140 P. 782, 40 Okla. 731, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 131 (Okla. 1914).

Opinion

RUSSELL, J.

This case was filed in this court on May 8, 1913, and presents error from the district court of Muskogee county. Since the plaintiffs in error filed their appeal in this court the controversies involved appear to have been fully sp* tied, as is shown by a certified copy of deed to the land involvse, properly executed, by Jennie L. Yarbrough (joined by W. T,. Yarbrough), plaintiff below,'who asserted claims to said land, the said deed being to Jqsie C. Spaulding as grantee. This land was the sole matter at issue. The motion to dismiss this appeal made by the attorneys of defendant in error sets forth the *732 execution of said deed on the 24th day of December, 1913, and accompanying affidavit of George C. Beidleman, one of the attorneys for defendant in error, alleges that he served the motion to dismiss this appeal, to which this, affidavit is attached, on the plaintiffs in error in said action on the 7th day of April, 1914-, by depositing in the postoffice at Okmulgee, Oklahoma, a true copy of said motion addressed to Bailey & Wyand, attorneys for plaintiffs in error, addressed to them at Muskogee, Oklahoma, with postage prepaid. This affidavit and motion to dismiss the appeal was filed in this court on April 8, 1914. Up to this time there has been made no answer or counter showing. The controversy having thus been determined, the rule announced by this court in Smith v. Boatman, 29 Okla. 818, 120 Pac. 599, is applicable.

The motion to dismiss the appeal is sustained.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Snelson v. Bodovitz
1920 OK 358 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1920)
Doherty v. Citizens' Bank of Grove
1920 OK 295 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1920)
McCrory v. Worley
1920 OK 137 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1920)
Spaulding v. Beidleman
1916 OK 741 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1916)
Holbrook v. Grayson
1914 OK 369 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1914)
Quinn v. State Ex Rel. Cole
1914 OK 337 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1914 OK 206, 140 P. 782, 40 Okla. 731, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spaulding-v-yarbrough-okla-1914.