Spaulding v. Wright Universal Electric Co.

City of New York Municipal Court

Spaulding v. Wright Universal Electric Co.

5 Misc. 591, 56 N.Y. St. Rep. 899

DecidedJuly 1, 1893

StatusPublished

This text of 5 Misc. 591 (Spaulding v. Wright Universal Electric Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Spaulding v. Wright Universal Electric Co., 5 Misc. 591, 56 N.Y. St. Rep. 899 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

Ehrlich, Ch. J.

The plaintiff recovered upon an express contract which was proved to the satisfaction of the' jury, and they accordingly found for the plaintiff for the balance due thereon.

The case was fairly tried and submitted to the jury, and there is no reason why their finding should be disturbed.

The exceptions are without merit, and the judgment must be affirmed, with costs.

Newburger and McCarthy, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI