Spaulding v. Lowe
58 Ill. 96
Opinion
It was error in the circuit court to give leave to reply, after overruling a demurrer to a plea in abatement, and this court has several times held this error to be cause of reversal. McKinstry v. Pennoyer, 1 Scam. 319; Motherell v. Beaver, 2 Gilm. 70. See also Eddy v. Brady, 16 Ill. 306. The error was not waived by anything subsequently done by defendants.
The judgment must be reversed, the verdict set aside, and judgment quashing the writ entered nunc pro tunc, upon the demurrer.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Spaulding v. Lowe, 58 Ill. 96 (Ill. 1871).
58 Ill. 96 (Spaulding v. Lowe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hill v. Trapp
206 Ill. App. 272 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1917)