Spaulding v. Knight

118 Mass. 528, 1875 Mass. LEXIS 422
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided October 5, 1875·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

1. The object of the rule of court is, that nothing less than evidence supported by oath shall be admitted. It was clearly within the discretion of the court below to admit oral testimony.

2. The bill of exceptions does not state the whole of the evidence. The letters relied upon by the defendant are only part of the evidence. If the evidence was conflicting, the finding of the judge of the court below was final. Whether the evidence was conflicting or not, as all the evidence does not appear, wei cannot revise such finding, and as no error of law is shown, the

Exceptions must he overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spaulding v. Knight, 118 Mass. 528, 1875 Mass. LEXIS 422 (Mass. 1875).

118 Mass. 528 (Spaulding v. Knight) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Coggins
87 N.E.2d 200 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1949)
Universal Adjustment Corp. v. Midland Bank, Ltd., of London
184 N.E. 152 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1933)
Goodwin v. Blanchard
64 A. 22 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1906)
Manning v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.
73 N.E. 645 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1905)
Borley v. Allison
63 N.E. 260 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1902)