Spaulding v. Inhabitants of Beverly

45 N.E. 1, 167 Mass. 149, 1896 Mass. LEXIS 43
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedNovember 12, 1896
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 45 N.E. 1 (Spaulding v. Inhabitants of Beverly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Spaulding v. Inhabitants of Beverly, 45 N.E. 1, 167 Mass. 149, 1896 Mass. LEXIS 43 (Mass. 1896).

Opinion

By the Court. There was evidence for the jury of a defect in the sidewalk caused by the presence of snow and ice, which defect might have- been remedied by reasonable care and diligence on the part of the town, and of which the town might have had knowledge by the exercise of proper care and diligence.

It is not contended that there was not evidence of the due care of the plaintiff. ■ Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kai Jakobsen v. Massachusetts Port Authority
520 F.2d 810 (First Circuit, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
45 N.E. 1, 167 Mass. 149, 1896 Mass. LEXIS 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spaulding-v-inhabitants-of-beverly-mass-1896.