Spaulding v. Inhabitants of Beverly

45 N.E. 1, 167 Mass. 149, 1896 Mass. LEXIS 43
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided November 12, 1896·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

By the Court. There was evidence for the jury of a defect in the sidewalk caused by the presence of snow and ice, which defect might have- been remedied by reasonable care and diligence on the part of the town, and of which the town might have had knowledge by the exercise of proper care and diligence.

It is not contended that there was not evidence of the due care of the plaintiff. ■ Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spaulding v. Inhabitants of Beverly, 45 N.E. 1, 167 Mass. 149, 1896 Mass. LEXIS 43 (Mass. 1896).

45 N.E. 1 (Spaulding v. Inhabitants of Beverly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kai Jakobsen v. Massachusetts Port Authority
520 F.2d 810 (First Circuit, 1975)