Spaulding Oil Mill Inc. v. Mayes

172 S.E. 734, 48 Ga. App. 613, 1934 Ga. App. LEXIS 148
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 12, 1934·No. 22944·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

The petition set out a cause of action, and the court properly-overruled the general demurrer.

Broyles, C. J., dissents. Haas, Gambrell & Gardner, for plaintiff in error. Q. L. Padgeil, Charles D. Hurt, George G. Finch, Abraham Ziegler, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spaulding Oil Mill Inc. v. Mayes, 172 S.E. 734, 48 Ga. App. 613, 1934 Ga. App. LEXIS 148 (Ga. Ct. App. 1934).

172 S.E. 734 (Spaulding Oil Mill Inc. v. Mayes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mitchell v. Burden Brothers, Inc.
189 S.E.2d 909 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1972)
Ellison v. Evans
69 S.E.2d 94 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)
Landis v. McGowan
165 P.2d 180 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1946)
Bibb Manufacturing Co. v. Souther
184 S.E. 421 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)