Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Spaulding Oil Mill Inc. v. Mayes

Spaulding Oil Mill Inc. v. Mayes

172 S.E. 734, 48 Ga. App. 613, 1934 Ga. App. LEXIS 148
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 12, 1934
Docket22944
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 172 S.E. 734 (Spaulding Oil Mill Inc. v. Mayes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Spaulding Oil Mill Inc. v. Mayes, 172 S.E. 734, 48 Ga. App. 613, 1934 Ga. App. LEXIS 148 (Ga. Ct. App. 1934).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

The petition set out a cause of action, and the court properly-overruled the general demurrer.

Broyles, C. J., dissents. Haas, Gambrell & Gardner, for plaintiff in error. Q. L. Padgeil, Charles D. Hurt, George G. Finch, Abraham Ziegler, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mitchell v. Burden Brothers, Inc.
189 S.E.2d 909 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1972)
Ellison v. Evans
69 S.E.2d 94 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)
Landis v. McGowan
165 P.2d 180 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1946)
Bibb Manufacturing Co. v. Souther
184 S.E. 421 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
172 S.E. 734, 48 Ga. App. 613, 1934 Ga. App. LEXIS 148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spaulding-oil-mill-inc-v-mayes-gactapp-1934.