Spaugh v. City of Winston-Salem
105 S.E.2d 280, 249 N.C. 133, 1958 N.C. LEXIS 420
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Spaugh v. City of Winston-Salem. Read the opinion of the Court — 249 N.C. 194 →
Opinion
The assignments of error brought up on this appeal relate only to the exclusion of testimony of male plaintiff, and of his father pertaining to matters not relevant and material to the issues raised by the pleadings. In them prejudicial error is not made to appear. Hence in the judgment below there is
No Error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Spaugh v. City of Winston-Salem, 105 S.E.2d 280, 249 N.C. 133, 1958 N.C. LEXIS 420 (N.C. 1958).
105 S.E.2d 280 (Spaugh v. City of Winston-Salem) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.