Spaugh v. City of Winston-Salem

105 S.E.2d 280, 249 N.C. 133, 1958 N.C. LEXIS 420
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Spaugh v. City of Winston-Salem. Read the opinion of the Court — 249 N.C. 194
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 29, 1958·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The assignments of error brought up on this appeal relate only to the exclusion of testimony of male plaintiff, and of his father pertaining to matters not relevant and material to the issues raised by the pleadings. In them prejudicial error is not made to appear. Hence in the judgment below there is

No Error.

Parker, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spaugh v. City of Winston-Salem, 105 S.E.2d 280, 249 N.C. 133, 1958 N.C. LEXIS 420 (N.C. 1958).

105 S.E.2d 280 (Spaugh v. City of Winston-Salem) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.