Spatt v. Elkraft Manufacturing Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Spatt v. Elkraft Manufacturing Co.

281 A.D. 896, 120 N.Y.S.2d 536, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3712

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 16, 1953

StatusPublished

This text of 281 A.D. 896 (Spatt v. Elkraft Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Spatt v. Elkraft Manufacturing Co., 281 A.D. 896, 120 N.Y.S.2d 536, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3712 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from an order entered February 19, 1952, placing the above-entitled action on the Deferred Calendar until June 1, 1954, and from an order entered May 5, 1952, denying plaintiff’s motion to vacate the order of February 19, 1952. Order of May 5, 1952, affirmed, without costs, and without prejudice to a renewal of the motion based on all the papers required to be submitted pursuant to subdivision (bb) of rule 2 of the Kings County Supreme Court Rules, including a physician’s affidavit of recent date which will disclose the nature and extent of plaintiff’s injuries and, if any such injuries are permanent, the nature and extent thereof. No opinion. Appeal from order entered February 19, 1952, dismissed, without costs. No such order is printed in the papers on appeal. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, MaeCrate and Beldock, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from an order entered February 19, 1952, placing the above-entitled action on the Deferred Calendar until June 1, 1954, and from an order entered May 5, 1952, denying plaintiff’s motion to vacate the order of February 19, 1952. Order of May 5, 1952, affirmed, without costs, and without prejudice to a renewal of the motion based on all the papers required to be submitted pursuant to subdivision (bb) of rule 2 of the Kings County Supreme Court Rules, including a physician’s affidavit of recent date which will disclose the nature and extent of plaintiff’s injuries and, if any such injuries are permanent, the nature and extent thereof. No opinion. Appeal from order entered February 19, 1952, dismissed, without costs. No such order is printed in the papers on appeal. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, MaeCrate and Beldock, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

281 A.D. 896, 120 N.Y.S.2d 536, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3712, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spatt-v-elkraft-manufacturing-co-nyappdiv-1953.