Spatt v. City of New York
191 N.E.2d 91, 13 N.Y.2d 618
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. There was sufficient basis for classification in the different tax treatment of trade-in automobiles in transactions taking place outside the City of New York by reason of the greater cost of enforcing the compensating use tax and the greater likelihood of resale of the used car within the City of New York. We pass upon no other question. No opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Ftjld, Van Voorhis, Burke, Foster and Scileppi.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Spatt v. City of New York, 191 N.E.2d 91, 13 N.Y.2d 618 (N.Y. 1963).
191 N.E.2d 91 (Spatt v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Trump v. Chu
65 N.Y. 20 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)