Spataro v. Rosenberg, Sewak, Pizzi & Bell, P.C.
This text of 593 A.2d 1274 (Spataro v. Rosenberg, Sewak, Pizzi & Bell, P.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The Petition for Allowance of Appeal is granted, and, in accordance with this Court’s decision in Muhammad v. Strassburger, et al., 526 Pa. 541, 587 A.2d 1346 (March 15, [472]*4721991), the Order of the Superior Court entered on November 14, 1990 at No. 243 Pittsburgh 1990 is hereby reversed in part and the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Civil Division, is reinstated with respect to Count Two of the Complaint.
The Order of the Superior Court affirming the trial court’s dismissal of Count One of the Complaint is affirmed. The Cross-Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
593 A.2d 1274, 527 Pa. 471, 1991 Pa. LEXIS 175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spataro-v-rosenberg-sewak-pizzi-bell-pc-pa-1991.