Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Spasaro v. Taco Metals, Inc.

Spasaro v. Taco Metals, Inc.

417 So. 2d 843, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28647
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 6, 1982
DocketNo. AI-104
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 417 So. 2d 843 (Spasaro v. Taco Metals, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Spasaro v. Taco Metals, Inc., 417 So. 2d 843, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28647 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

MILLS, Judge.

Spasaro appeals a compensation order finding no causal relationship between his heart attack and a compensable automobile accident. We affirm.

Dr. Goodman’s testimony, as well as intervening normal electrocardiograms, is competent substantial evidence to support the order.

AFFIRMED.

BOOTH and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barile Excavation and Pipeline Sewer Improvement v. Hough
417 So. 2d 843 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
417 So. 2d 843, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28647, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spasaro-v-taco-metals-inc-fladistctapp-1982.