Sparrow v. Trustees of Davidson College
77 N.C. 35
Opinion
The word “or” in ch. 63-, § 54, of Bat. Rev, evidently should be read “and.” It is probably a mere misprint. If a defendant be personally served with a Justice’s warrant he has notice of the action and is bound to take notice of the judgment if one be taken against him. McDaniel v. Watkins, 76 N. C. 399, is therefore in point.
Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sparrow v. Trustees of Davidson College, 77 N.C. 35 (N.C. 1877).
77 N.C. 35 (Sparrow v. Trustees of Davidson College) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. . Johnson
13 S.E. 843 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1891)
Spaugh v. . Boner
85 N.C. 208 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1881)
Governor Ex. Rel. Trustees of University of N. C. v. Lassiter
83 N.C. 38 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1880)