Sparrow v. Riddick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sparrow v. Riddick

303 A.D.2d 429, 755 N.Y.S.2d 886

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 7, 2003

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 303 A.D.2d 429 (Sparrow v. Riddick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sparrow v. Riddick, 303 A.D.2d 429, 755 N.Y.S.2d 886 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

—In separate proceedings pursuant to Election Law article 16 to (1) invalidate a certificate nominating Betty Cross and Henry Holley as candidates of the Independence Party for the public office of Village Trustee of the Village of Hempstead in an election to be held on March 18, 2003 (Proceeding No. 1), and (2) invalidate a certificate filed with the Clerk of the Village of Hempstead on January 30, 2003, nominating Wayne J. Hall and Perry Pettus as candidates of the Independence Party for the public office of Village Trustee of the Village of Hemp-stead in an election to be held on March 18, 2003 (Proceeding No. 2), the appeal is from a final order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Jonas, J.), entered February 21, 2003, which dismissed the petition in Proceeding No. 1 and granted the petition in the Proceeding No. 2, and invalidated the certificate filed with the Clerk of the Village of Hempstead on January 30, 2003, nominating Wayne J. Hall and Perry Pettus as candidates of the Independence Party for the public office of Village Trustee of the Village of Hempstead.

[430]*430Ordered that the final order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Theresa Sparrow, the petitioner in Proceeding No. 1, did not join the Nassau County Board of Elections (hereinafter the Board) as a party within the 10-day period of limitation set forth in Election Law § 16-102 (2). Under the circumstances of this case the Board is a necessary party and the failure to join it was a fatal defect that could not be cured after the expiration of the 10-day period (see Matter of Marin v Board of Elections, 67 NY2d 634 [1986]; Matter of Curdo v Kelly, 193 AD2d 738 [1993]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly dismissed Proceeding No. 1.

In Proceeding No. 2, the Supreme Court properly granted the petition and invalidated the certificate filed with the Clerk of the Village of Hempstead on January 30, 2003, nominating Wayne J. Hall and Perry Pettus as candidates of the Independence Party for the public office of Village Trustee of the Village of Hempstead (see Election Law § 15-108 [2] [a]).

The appellants’ remaining contention is without merit. Florio, J.P., S. Miller, Crane and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In separate proceedings pursuant to Election Law article 16 to (1) invalidate a certificate nominating Betty Cross and Henry Holley as candidates of the Independence Party for the public office of Village Trustee of the Village of Hempstead in an election to be held on March 18, 2003 (Proceeding No. 1), and (2) invalidate a certificate filed with the Clerk of the Village of Hempstead on January 30, 2003, nominating Wayne J. Hall and Perry Pettus as candidates of the Independence Party for the public office of Village Trustee of the Village of Hemp-stead in an election to be held on March 18, 2003 (Proceeding No. 2), the appeal is from a final order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Jonas, J.), entered February 21, 2003, which dismissed the petition in Proceeding No. 1 and granted the petition in the Proceeding No. 2, and invalidated the certificate filed with the Clerk of the Village of Hempstead on January 30, 2003, nominating Wayne J. Hall and Perry Pettus as candidates of the Independence Party for the public office of Village Trustee of the Village of Hempstead.

[430]*430Ordered that the final order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Theresa Sparrow, the petitioner in Proceeding No. 1, did not join the Nassau County Board of Elections (hereinafter the Board) as a party within the 10-day period of limitation set forth in Election Law § 16-102 (2). Under the circumstances of this case the Board is a necessary party and the failure to join it was a fatal defect that could not be cured after the expiration of the 10-day period (see Matter of Marin v Board of Elections, 67 NY2d 634 [1986]; Matter of Curdo v Kelly, 193 AD2d 738 [1993]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly dismissed Proceeding No. 1.

In Proceeding No. 2, the Supreme Court properly granted the petition and invalidated the certificate filed with the Clerk of the Village of Hempstead on January 30, 2003, nominating Wayne J. Hall and Perry Pettus as candidates of the Independence Party for the public office of Village Trustee of the Village of Hempstead (see Election Law § 15-108 [2] [a]).

The appellants’ remaining contention is without merit. Florio, J.P., S. Miller, Crane and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

303 A.D.2d 429, 755 N.Y.S.2d 886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sparrow-v-riddick-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack