Sparrow v. Dixon
This text of Sparrow v. Dixon (Sparrow v. Dixon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2024-2220 _____________________________
DONTAVIOUS SPARROW,
Petitioner,
v.
RICKY D. DIXON, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.
April 16, 2025
PER CURIAM.
DISMISSED. See Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004).
OSTERHAUS, C.J., and ROBERTS and BILBREY, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Dontavious Sparrow, pro se, Petitioner.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Sparrow v. Dixon, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sparrow-v-dixon-fladistctapp-2025.